| Another Big IRS Campaign When there is a mismatch in the
employee name and/or Social Security number as reported on Forms W-2, compared to records
at the Social Security Administration, the wages reported with the mismatched name or SSN
are placed in a suspense file. Because FICA taxes were paid and withheld from wages posted
to suspense, employees with a non-matching SSN on their Forms W-2(s) lose benefits to
which they are entitled.
To reduce the size of the swelling suspense fund,
the Internal Revenue Service and the Social Security Administration have been conducting a
joint campaign to reduce invalid SSN/name reporting. In the latest initiative in this
campaign, the IRS has decided to begin penalizing employers for filing Forms W-2 with
mismatched names and Social Security numbers.
Unresolved is the definition of conditions
employers will be able to cite in defense of their actions (or inaction). As the IRS
describes it, there is no clear definition of "reasonable cause" for failure to
provide a matching name and number. Reasonable cause for a reporting error exists if the
failure was due to an event beyond the employer's control or there were mitigating factors
the employer can show that it took reasonable steps to avoid the error.
In the case of information returns, such as Form
1099-MISC, under present rules the employer can establish "reasonable cause" for
failure to match names and tax identification numbers (TINS), by presenting a properly
completed Form W-9 (Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification).
However, employers do not have an equivalent document to prove due diligence for Form W-2
reporting. Form W-4 has been suggested for this purpose, but there is no current
requirement that every employee must file Form W-4 with the employer.
The maximum penalty is $50 for each incorrect
information return up to a maximum penalty of $100,000 for the tax year.
The IRS began the penalty program with
mismatches on tax year 2008 Forms W-2, filed in February-March 2009. Now may be a good time
for employers to check for payroll or human resources process issues that might be
producing or allowing this type of reporting error.
Nancy

|